I got a lecture from my son today. It is at times like this
one realises that this younger generation are so much more experienced with
online etiquette and practices. It had arisen from me reading an exchange
on the innocuous topic of protecting the environment from over construction -
a constant threat in over crowded Malta. Despite the abundance of old dilapidated
buildings and flats developers are eager to use virgin, unspoiled ground.
Such property is much easier and less costly to construct than the costly
redevelopment of old premises. But at what cost to the environment and
the precious remaining green areas available. One comment on the original
posting caught my eye. The posting took a tangential approach to the
problem. He said that the issue was the number of refugees reaching the
shores in boats from Africa and stated that in his opinion, "Their boats
should be bombed before they reached Malta and that those left in the water
shot." Coming fast on the heels of the many drownings happening in
the Mediterranean as refugees flee the north coast of Africa in makeshift boats
exposed to the elements. As photos of the bodies carefully wrapped in body
bags filled newspaper pages, this posting really infuriated me and before I
actually thought about it properly, I responded to his comment by addressing
him personally with the ill advised posting,
"What kind of nut are you?"
Fresh in my mind were the findings of the
UN report on the Rwanda massacre when one million people were slaughtered in a
matter of months. In fact it is now reckoned that 70% of the Tutsi population
was murdered by their Hutu neighbours. In the report the responsibility
of local radio/media was highlighted. Not only did a local radio station
call upon loyal Hutus to kill their neighbour Tutsis but indeed as well as
calling on patriotic duty they proceeded to name local Tutsi to be killed and
kept up a murderous avalanche spreading unchecked across the country. It
is a salutary lesson in how the media can be not just a contributor to violence
but indeed an instigator.
The Golden Dawn Party in Greece has waged
a vicious street war against immigrants/refugees with considerable support from
many who should know better. This neo-nazi, fascist party has
demonstrated its xenophobic agenda and perhaps its true nature is ably
demonstrated by the behaviour of its spokesman, Kasidiaris on live TV when he
throws water on one woman and assaults another violently live on TV.
Kasidiaris bears a tattoo on his arm of a Nazi-style swastika. Not
that you would expect much more from a party whose leader Nikos
Michaloliakos has publicly denied the holocaust, questioning the
number of Jews murdered and claiming there were no gas chambers in
concentration camps,
"There were no ovens, this is a lie ... there were no gas
chambers either," he said during a TV interview. I find it shocking
that despite this public display of violence against women (2012) he was not arrested and a subsequent Facebook
set up in support of his violence to the two women received 6000 likes in 24hrs! He was
later arrested for murder, extortion, and involvement in the disappearance
of up to 100 migrants in September of last year (2013). Depressingly, On 2
October 2013, Ilias Kasidiaris was released on a 50,000 euro bail. Am
I the only one holding my head in despair at all this?
Surely this rise in the language of hatred and violence against
human beings of any nationality or religion has to be challenged on all fronts.
Whether on our newspapers, our radio, TV or even online media. It
cannot be accepted or ignored surely?
Europe has seen within its own borders how
such language can lead to a killing frenzy. The perpetrator of violence
must be prosecuted by the full force of the law. Those that call for
violence on others, whatever their ideology/reasons must not be given airtime
to propagate their hatred in others. I really loved how this Turkish
interviewer put an instant end to the religious bigotry he encountered.
It is a positive experience to see someone in the media handle the
situation with integrity and principles intact.
I wish I could say I handled my online situation as well as this.
It was the thought that someone could seriously advocate the bombing of
people fleeing poverty/war that rankled but my response was to insult, hardly
raising the tone of the communication. The result was predicable.
Within minutes of my posting there was a vitriolic
response from the nutter with more of his vile perspectives shared.
It was at this point my son wearily lectured me on the pitfalls of
engaging with the despicable on the comments section of postings. It just
gives them the oxygen of publicity as more responses boost their profile and
agenda. Suitably chastised I have been reflecting on the lessons learned.
This week for the first time I have seriously contemplated closing down
Facebook and withdrawing from this stealer of my time and creativity. It
has long struck me that valuable time with loved ones has begun to seriously
suffer from my over engagement with this media. It is so addictive to
check up on friends and touch base with birthdays, triumphs, losses, births
etc. When I think of how much time it steals from me on a daily basis the
answer is a simple one, it must go! I'd appreciate input from those of
you out there, your thoughts, coping strategies etc before a final decision is
made.
